"It rains!"
Jun. 23rd, 2011 02:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Pellinor has long claimed that the best way to recognise a primitive civilisation is to listen to what they say when they ask you to follow them to meet their leader. If they merely intone "Come!" they are a primitive people who are ruled by robe-wearing elders, and there is a risk that they will take superstitious exception to your electronic transpondulator, and try to burn you as a witch. If they say "Come with me," they probably have transpondulators of their own, although they may well pose different dangers.
However, the flaw in his theory is that you have to make contact before you can carry out this test. By the time you've heard their "Come!" you are already committed to following your primitive chap to his elders. Fortunately, there is another way to test how primitive your culture is, which can be done merely by listening to the conversation of the natives. It starts raining. "It rains!" cries the primitive culture; "it's raining," says the advanced one. The arrival of a friend is reported. "He comes!" says the primitive peasant. "He's coming," says the advanced one.
What remains to investigate is precisely when this linguistic change happens in the course of a civilisation's technological development. Does it come just before steam engines? Is it a vital development without which a civilisation cannot create computers? And, if so, please can we start researching what new linguistic change is necessary before we can successfully invent transporters?
However, the flaw in his theory is that you have to make contact before you can carry out this test. By the time you've heard their "Come!" you are already committed to following your primitive chap to his elders. Fortunately, there is another way to test how primitive your culture is, which can be done merely by listening to the conversation of the natives. It starts raining. "It rains!" cries the primitive culture; "it's raining," says the advanced one. The arrival of a friend is reported. "He comes!" says the primitive peasant. "He's coming," says the advanced one.
What remains to investigate is precisely when this linguistic change happens in the course of a civilisation's technological development. Does it come just before steam engines? Is it a vital development without which a civilisation cannot create computers? And, if so, please can we start researching what new linguistic change is necessary before we can successfully invent transporters?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 01:42 pm (UTC)This is because nobody wants to be bothered by supplicants, but the primitive society hasn't yet thought of a way of getting out of it. The more advanced the culture, the more elaborate the excuses and obstacles placed in your way.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 02:10 pm (UTC)Possibly they have primitive linguistics because of being a slave race. I will observe carefully as I continue my mammoth rewatch project and discover if they become less monosyllabic once they gain independence.
Of course they are also a sort of small orange and chocolate spongecake, which may confuse the results of the research project.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 04:25 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, I don't know enough about Jaffa to judge whether they fit into one of these categories. I do know, however, that they are not biscuits.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 06:26 pm (UTC)I think you're ignoring the vast amount of language communicated by, for example, Teelc (or whatever his name is) using just his eyebrows and lips.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 06:53 pm (UTC)I'm wondering if the actual spelling is more evidence that the Jaffa belong in Fantasyland - the apostrophe is a dead giveaway.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 08:18 pm (UTC)Actually, 'indeed' has two syllables, but it's still only one word...
I think the Jaffa are too angsty to be Dothraki/Klingons, but they definitely have that in common with the poor slain Haradrim that Sam sees. Arguably angst a more fantasy than sci fi characteristic anyway ?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 08:37 pm (UTC)(At least, not the commercial kind. There's plenty of angsty Stargate fanfic, but it doesn't tend to be the kind that makes much of the sci-fi basis of the show.)
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 06:31 pm (UTC)This is normally when they've gotten to the mystic robes-and-no-apparent-technology stage of development, at which the cutting-edge transpondulator will be examined in an amused way, with maybe a comment on how quaint it is to see mere matter and non-psychic energy being used. So it may just be a manifestation of that.
On the other hand it tends to be said in a more condescending way, as parent to idiot child, so perhaps the development is that - as with the wafty robes - what *appears* to be primitive and unsophisticated is in fact developed way beyond our comprehension.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-23 07:08 pm (UTC)Oh! Oh! And I was wearing my cloak in the cold evenings at Lichfield, and I definitely heard myself say, "It rains!" Today I was in my work clothes, it started raining, and I said, "It's raining." Proof!
no subject
Date: 2011-06-24 07:26 pm (UTC)