According to the local paper's website "less than a handful" of thefts happened at the Bestival. How big is a handful, I wonder. Can you actually have less than a handful, or would "less than a handful" otherwise be called "one." Or does this mean a theft of something so titchy-tiny that you can't even hold it in one hand without it slipping through your fingers? Theft of an atom, perhaps? On the other hand, if you stole one single elephant, fitting it in your hand would be challenging.
What's bigger: a handful, or a few? How much bigger than "only a few" is "quite a few"? What range of numbers are covered by "one or two"? How much bigger than "one or two" is "two of three?" I have to admit that, to me, "a couple" probably actually goes up to 4, and, depending on context, "millions" might start at about 20, as does "a million and one." If you're dealing with a subset of the entire population of the world, I suppose a quantity can simultaneously be "millions" and "only a few".
Perhaps I should get back to work...
What's bigger: a handful, or a few? How much bigger than "only a few" is "quite a few"? What range of numbers are covered by "one or two"? How much bigger than "one or two" is "two of three?" I have to admit that, to me, "a couple" probably actually goes up to 4, and, depending on context, "millions" might start at about 20, as does "a million and one." If you're dealing with a subset of the entire population of the world, I suppose a quantity can simultaneously be "millions" and "only a few".
Perhaps I should get back to work...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 10:06 am (UTC)Do we get to see you up here next month, BTW?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:49 am (UTC)1. a. A quantity that fills the hand; as much or many as the hand can grasp or contain.
a700 Epinal Gloss. 645 Manticum: handful beouuas [Corpus Gl. beowes]. c1000 Lamb. Ps. cxxv[i]. 6 (Bosw.) Berende handfulla heora. c1000 ÆLFRIC Lev. ii. 2 Nime hira ane handfulle smideman. a1225 Ancr. R. 254 An honful {ygh}erden. 1382 WYCLIF Gen. xxxvii. 7, I wenede vs to bynden hondfullis in the feelde..and {ygh}oure hondfullis stondynge al aboute to loute myn hondful.
However, later on...
5. slang. A five years' prison sentence.
1930 J. LAIT Big House i. 6 A five-year sentence is a ‘handful’. 1953 M. GILBERT Fear to Tread ix. 118 He's had a two-stretch... He'll collect a handful next time. 1966 New Society 31 Mar. 22/2 Going up for a handful (receiving a sentence of five years' imprisonment).
I'm sure that I've seen 'a handful' in other contexts meaning 'five', and this was what I was brought up to think it meant anyway.
Alternatively,
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:59 am (UTC)But perhaps as it occurs in a policemanly context in your original text, that's what they mean?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:43 pm (UTC)On a similar line, what's the maximum amount of time that can be assumed by the phrase "in a minute." If someone says "I'll do it in just a sec" can we assume that it will be done sooner than if they said "I'll do it in a minute"?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:50 pm (UTC)We have seen the oldest brick building in Monterey. I've lived in a brick-built house that was twice as old.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 07:36 am (UTC)And when
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:40 pm (UTC)When we were in Orkney, I was reading a collection of comments from Mass Observation diaires from 1945 - 53. There was a contemporary advert for Ovaltine, aimed at librarians; saying that they had such busy lives nowadays, what with stocking the shelves and so on, that they needed lots of energy.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 01:24 pm (UTC)At least they will have the thieves footprints! 'Stop anyone with muddy shoes Constable'
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 07:37 am (UTC)And since a hand can fit into a pocket, presumably a pocketful is just a little more than a handful.