ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2008-07-28 10:50 pm
Entry tags:

Lost arts

Don't people nowadays know about this whole dipping your headlights thing when people are approaching or when following someone close behind? Is this one of those dying arts, like basket-weaving, thatching, and bothering to indicate when turning left, so people don't sit there needlessly giving way to you?
ladyofastolat: (Library lady)
2008-07-18 12:01 pm
Entry tags:

If I ruled the world...

When I am supreme ruler of the universe, the following things will be declared illegal forthwith:

- Books with one word titles. Exemptions will very probably be granted when the word in question is sufficiently unusual, but common words are right out. Calling your book by a word ignored by most search engines (such as "it") shall lead to punishment more dreadful than any man has ever dreamt.

- Authors who insist on spelling their name in an unexpected fashion. If your readers are going to ask for you as "Susan" then you will jolly well be forced to spell your name "Susan", not "Soozun". (Made-up example to protect the guilty.)

- Books that appear to be called on thing - e.g. "Let's talk about recycling" - but actually secretly call themselves something else - "Recyling", which happens to be in the "Let's talk about" series - and don't bother to tell anyone.

- Vacuous celebrities with no talent who still manage to get themselves publishing deals, which they use to "write" books telling 6 year old girls that beauty is everything.

Actually, on second thoughts:

- Stupid, idiotic, poorly designed search systems. Once they're banned, I might even allow the others to become legal again. Except for the last one. There's no excuse for that.
ladyofastolat: (Hear me roar)
2008-07-03 01:13 pm
Entry tags:

Opinion is not fact

Agh. I really, really mustn't listen to radio phone-ins. I don't normally do it, but this time the radio happened to be on in the car at the wrong moment. I just get so cross and so frustrated and so depressed at the sheer number of people who know they are right. They spout their bigoted opinions and their narrow little world views, and they say it with absolute unshakeable conviction that they are right, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is morally wrong or worthless or stupid or rotten to the core. It makes me want to bang my head against the wall and cry. Occasionaly I might even more or less agree with what they're saying, but they state it as such categorical fact that I want to pin them to the wall and devil's advocate them to death.
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2008-07-02 02:41 pm
Entry tags:

Road vexation

For the record, I don't speed. I certainly can't say hand on heart that I've never accidentally gone a couple of miles an hour over the limit, but I do try not to. There are many occasions when I go very much slower than legally allowed, such as when driving through a housing estate littered with parked cars and packs of playing children, or when on a single-track road with not enough passing places, high hedges, suicidal rabbits and lots of blind corners.

Now, our Council has this strange idea that "island roads are different" and likes to slap 40 limits of any road that stays still long enough, even those that really don't merit it. Therefore, when I say that this morning I was driving on a road that still has a 60 limit, you should assume that it's particularly wide and clear and hazard-free.

Or so I thought. To the person in front of me, it was clearly more dangerous than a jungle track beset with crocodiles. To the person in front of me, the "unrestricted" sign clearly meant "drive at 27 miles an hour, but ensure that at least once a minute you slow sharply to 17 miles an hour, making sure that this slowing is not related to any external prompt such as a bend or an approaching wide load, but is always for no reason at all."

I'm sure there are many reasons why someone might want to crawl along an A road. Maybe he had a priceless goldfish on his front seat that he was transporting to a show. Maybe he was a secret service agent who'd been told his car would explode if he went over 30. However, there were also plenty of nice, empty, alluring lay-bys where he could have pulled in and let people pass. All I can think of is that his childhood ambition was leading a procession of fifty people across the Isle of Wight.

Then to go to the other extreme, there was the chap who was trying to get from Newport to Cowes as part of an unbroken stream of cars all going at exactly 40, the limit. Whenever he could – and, often, when he really couldn't – he jumped one car forward in the stream, thus meaning that he reached Cowes about twenty seconds earlier than he would otherwise have done, but forced half a dozen people going in the opposite way to slam on their brakes for him.
ladyofastolat: (In comes I)
2008-03-17 10:27 pm

St Patrick's (not) day

Yes, yes, I know I'm predictable. I've said it all before, but... but...! I went to a dance practice tonight in the room above a pub, and the pub was heaving. Packed with people, full of green and shamrocks and special offers on Guinness. Now, leaving aside the fact that it isn't actually St Patrick's Day today, due to the whole "cancelled it if clashes with Holy Week" thing, here we have an English pub, in England, in which I bet well nigh a hundred percent of the people inside were English, absolutely packed for St Patrick's Day. Fair enough. I have no objection to them doing this. I have no objection to them celebrating St Andrew's Day and St David's Day, and any special day from any other world culture that they want to celebrate. I'm all for multiculturalism and diversity... but I just wish that there could be at least some attempt to celebrate the English special day and reclaim it from the racists and the xenophobes and the aggressive patriots.

I bet this pub won't be doing special offers on local real ales on St George's Day, or putting roses on the wall. It bet they won't be playing English folk music in the background. I bet they won't invite Morris dancers to perform. It's quite incredible how the English have managed to neglect, or even laugh at, their own traditions and folk culture. That leaves a gap that the racists can step in and fill, and make it so that standing up and saying, "hey, my country has some rather nice traditions, actually, and I'd rather like to celebrate them" gets heard as "my country right or wrong, and down with the rest." A couple of years ago, BBC radio's special St George's day programming was a concert with music from Wales, Scotland and Ireland... because to play English music would be jingoistic, I presume, so not allowed.

Anyway... Yes, I've said it all before. I just need to quote Roots again, though:

Roots lyrics )
ladyofastolat: (Hear me roar)
2008-02-22 09:05 am
Entry tags:

Outrage!

A birthday card was just passed around at work for us all to sign. It included a rogue apostrophe! This was in the proper printed greeting! You kind of expect these thing's in handwritten sign's in greengrocers shop's or special's board's in pub's, and we all make slip's of the pen every now and then, but a proper published greeting's card? Outrage! Outrage! What i's the world coming to? et'c e'tc.

It's not even a funny mistake. Rogue inverted commas can be. ("Fresh" chicken soup). Confusion over similar words can be. ("The meat is complimented by the sauce." "Beware the deadly rouge gorilla fighters" etc.) This was just annoying. I am sorry to say that I had to discreetly cross it out before I could sign the card.
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2008-01-24 03:09 pm

Evil games?

While I was driving across the island today, the Health Secretary came on the radio, talking about his plans to make eating hamburgers a criminal offence. (Okay, no, he actually didn't say this, but it didn't seem far off.) One of the things he said was how they were working with computer game manufacturers to find ways to ensuring that children don't spend too much time indulging in such sedentary activities. This part wasn't elaborated on, at least in the part of the programme I was able to hear.

Given that computer game manuals always advise you not to play for too long, and many games already flash up messages suggesting that you take a break, I don't see what else they can do short of making the game stop working if you play it for too long. Imagine LAN parties in this brave new world. There you are, stalking your friends down a dark corridor, when suddenly the screen goes blank. "You have to go Outside now," intones the voice of the Health Secretary. "This game is now locked until you can prove that you have burned off 500 calories." Or you could be on the point of killing that impossible boss who's troubled you for days, when suddenly the screen flashes urgent red. "Pringles proximity alert! Pringles proximity alert! Remove the Pringles immediately! Replace them with vegetables now or this game will be terminated!"

Why limit it to computer games? Well, of course, everybody knows that computer games are pure evil, created by sociopaths whose sole aim is to corrupt innocent six year olds with games of graphic violence, but apart from that… What about books? Stop children from playing games, and they might pick up a book and, absorbed in the story, do no exercise for hours on end! This vile trade must be stopped! No-one should be allowed to read more than a chapter without stopping and going Outside to do some healthy exercise. What about selling books on a chapter by chapter basis, and making it illegal to buy more than one chapter at a time? Oh, and all bookshops must be located at least two miles from the nearest road, so people have to walk to get each new chapter. Yes, that will work. What a wise idea! It's amazing society didn't collapse years ago, with all this wanton unchecked reading of books. Thank goodness we have the government to look after us!
ladyofastolat: (Library lady)
2008-01-22 12:34 pm

On reading for pleasure

This is a predictable rant, because I know I've ranted about similar things before. In fact, I can probably leave half the words blank, and you'd all be able to fill them in. (Now, there's an idea for an LJ post…)

On reading for pleasure etc. )
ladyofastolat: (Default)
2008-01-16 05:26 pm
Entry tags:

Overseas?

Does anyone else get annoyed by the fact a film's takings are usually broken down as "domestic" (i.e. the USA), and "overseas" (the rest of the world) even if the film was made in one of those "overseas" countries. My hackles rise whenever I encounter it. If it's an American publication, written for American people, about an American film, then fine. If it's an international publication, written for people across the world, then I don't think they should do it. I don't mind them breaking it down that way per se, but I wish they'd label the categories "US box office" and "non-US box office," or something. I find it quite vexing to be lumped into a generic "overseas" - a far less important market, it seems, usually quoted only as an after-thought - especially when we're talking about a British-made film.

I also wish they wouldn't talk about these "overseas" takings as being in dollars. I've often read in British newspapers that a film took "the equivalent of ten millions pounds in America." Fine. It makes more sense to British readers to have it translated like this. However, I don't like reading that a film "took ten million dollars in the UK." It didn't. It took however many pounds.

Over-reacting...?
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2008-01-08 02:04 pm
Entry tags:

Television irritations

I watched the second episode of Sense and Sensibility last night, which I'd recorded the previous night. We reached the end of the episode, got a fraction of a second of blackness… and – bang! – straight into a preview of next week's episode. I hate how they do this. I'm quite fond of trailers in their place, but there are definitely times when I don't want to see any spoilers for the next episode. At any rate, I like to have the choice of whether to watch it or not, rather than to have it come crashing in before I've realised that the episode has actually finished, totally ruining the effect of the ending.

Announcers are even worse. A few weeks ago, I was watching an episode of a TV series in which heartbreaking things happened. The end of the episode was quiet and deeply emotional, and I was in tears. The screen just began to fade to black… and in came the loud and cheery voice of the announcer telling me about some stupid laugh-a-minute programme coming up later in the week. (Yes, I know I can just reach for the "mute" button the moment the programme is finished, but it's hard to get quite so emotionally caught up in a programme if you're poised over the remote control, ready to mute at the slightest hint of an imminent ending.)

Viewers often complain about things like this, but the BBC (and others) never take the blind bit of notice. Of course, they want to attract and keep viewers, and presumably they've done research that finds that more people are attracted by pushy trailers and announcements that are deterred by it. It's just a shame. I wonder if things like this genuinely do attract more people than they deter. Perhaps they assume that people like me will get cross, but will still watch. However, I've pretty much given up watching television documentaries because I've got so annoyed by their irritating habits, such as concentrating on the presenter and not the content, and telling us everything three times – one in a "coming up" preview, once properly, and once in a "previously in" recap.
ladyofastolat: (Default)
2008-01-03 01:57 pm
Entry tags:

Historical films

I was talking to someone today about historical inaccuracies in films. He was of the opinion that they didn't matter, and that only sad anoraks cared about them. I was of the opinion that they potentially do matter – and matter rather more than faithfulness in literary adaptations.

Historical films )
ladyofastolat: (Hear me roar)
2007-12-18 03:28 pm
Entry tags:

Christmas

I expect people will accuse me of being bah humbuggy, but, hey…

Say something like, "It's three weeks until Christmas" (when it is three weeks until Christmas, of course), and the standard response from most adults is a pained, "Oh, please, don't." Library book issues plummet in December, as people say with heart-felt regret, "Oh, I wish I had time to read, but I've got so much still to do." (By the way, it always bothers me when I hear parents say to their children at the end of November, "You can't borrow any more books today, because Father Christmas might bring you some." Subtext: "I'm too busy rushing around like a headless chicken buying presents, and will forget to return them, so you're not allowed books for the next month.")

Yesterday, I heard someone complain about how they'd been out for six nights out of the past seven at various Christmas parties, "and you have to go, haven't you, because it's rude not to, but it's just too much." Today, I heard someone explain at great length about how they "had" to spend Christmas with various relatives they had nothing in common with, and how much they were "dreading" it. Someone else said how their mum used to spend all of Christmas day cooking, and then would go to bed after the washing-up was done, exhausted.

The shops are full of stressed people, their tempers close to breaking, struggling desperately to buy something for distant relatives they don't know – and what chance is there that they will get something the relative actually wants? Parents are scouring the shops for whatever the media tells them is this year's "must have present", and fear their child's Christmas will be ruined by not having it.

While a lot of individuals have very happy Christmases, an awful lot of people seem to be made very stressed by something that's supposed to be joyous. I wonder what's gone wrong.
ladyofastolat: (In comes I)
2007-12-16 10:04 am
Entry tags:

Travel grrs

We spent all of yesterday dancing on The Mainland, for our annual Christmas jaunt to Lymington. Going without a coat, and trusting in raggy jackets and layers, was a very stupid thing to do, since it was freezing, but someone came to my rescue with a spare body warmer (presumably brought along for their spare body), and various market stalls provided cheap fluffy gloves, warm socks etc. 'Twas icy cold.

At the end of the day, we extracted ourselves from the pub, paid for our very nice dinner (certain people who shall be nameless had two puddings, and tried hard to get a whole extra pint of custard), and headed to the station. Disappearing guards, trains and drivers )
ladyofastolat: (Hear me roar)
2007-11-14 05:25 pm
Entry tags:

Recyling

"Recycle!" they tell us. They talk about going to a fortnightly rubbish collection, to force people to recycle, rather than throw away. They talk about charging per rubbish bag. School children (at least here) have been sent out with pledge books, to collect "I will recycle" pledges from any adult they can find. Okay. So why, Mr Council, do you make it so hard for us to do it?

We have a fortnightly kerbside recycling collection. Actually remembering which is our "on" week and which is our "off" week usually defeats us. Even when we remember, our problems are far from over. The black box can be used for glass and paper, but not just any old paper, oh no. Newspapers are fine. Stapled magazines are fine. Glued magazines? No way. Junk mail? Old envelopes? Amazon packaging? Cereal packets? Pizza boxes? All the multifarious bits of cardboard that supermarket food gets wrapped in? No to all of these. However, the local recycling place (only open at weekends, and not all day) takes all paper and card and plastic all mixed together. Since this is, one would expect, the ultimate destination of the kerbside collection, why does the kerbside one have more restrictions? We tend to chuck all cardboard and paper into the black box, which means that separating it out on black box day becomes too much of a nuisance, and we drive off to the recycling place at the weekend - thus making an extra, ought-not-to-be-unnecessary journey - where at least they'll take it all, and not get sniffy about a stray envelope.

We can also put out garden rubbish for a fortnightly collection, but only in special bags that we have to buy at £1 each, and don't get back. Where do all these bags go? Cluttering up landfill? In contrast, if we drive to the recycling place (only open at weekends, and not all day), we can tip the garden waste in the skip, and keep the bag. We can also collect food waste, but these, too, need to be in plastic bags. Someone at work says she doesn't have a single plastic bag in the house, since she loads her shopping direct from trolley into crates in the car, yet she's been told that she's got to go out and buy (or otherwise obtain) plastic bags if she wants use this service.

And while we're on the subject of bags... It's amazing how much effort it requires to stop people giving up bags in shops, even when you've come armed with your own re-useable ones... But this suddenly sounds familiar, so I think I must have ranted about this before. I'll be quiet now.
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2007-11-09 04:51 pm

Unsuitable for younger readers

I read today that some booksellers have put "not suitable for younger readers" stickers on Jacqueline Wilson's latest book, in response to complaints from outraged parents that it featured a gay kiss.

Now, Jacqueline Wilson's books are adored by girls aged 8 and over, but some of her books are specifically aimed at older girls – 14, or so – and are full of issues that most parents would consider unsuitable for 8 year olds. The trouble is, the cover design is no different from her younger books, and of course all her fans are eager to read all her books. I'm sure that a lot of parents buy her teenage books for their 8 year olds, not realising the content. I have no objection to a sticker alerting readers and their parents to the fact that these few titles are aimed at a different audience from her usual books.

It's the "because of a gay kiss" element that bothers me. The book – and, yes, I've read it – is about a 13 year old girl who has been best friends with the boy next door for her whole life. She has lately started having romantic feelings for him, but he seems rather more interested in a boy at his new school. Later on, he seems very distressed, and it turns out that – off-camera - he tried to kiss this boy, who reacted with disgust. The girl, although upset on her own account, supports him as a friend, as does his family, although the other boys at school are less understanding. His family also point out him that same-sex crushes are a not-uncommon feature of adolescence, and that his feelings might change, but also make entirely clear that they'll support him and love him whatever happens.

However, in another plot strand, the girl is befriended by a wild and precocious girl at school. This girl lives with little sign of parental presence, and has wild parties in which all the 13 and 14 year olds drink spirits. She sends her boyfriend a topless photo of herself, and talks about having sex – or almost having sex. But no mention of this in the report of the "outraged parents." One sensitively-handled off-camera attempted gay kiss: shocking! Underage drinking and 13 year olds (possibly) having sex: no problem!
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2007-10-28 05:38 pm
Entry tags:

Weekend grrs

1. When you drop a laptop on top of a glass of home-made plum wine, it is not good for the carpet, the glass, your feet, or the laptop. Fortunately, the stain comes out, feet prove freakishly good at avoiding deadly injury, and the glass was only cheap, but the laptop appears to have died completely as a result of its late-night ordeal. Grr!!!!

2. It is nice having a calendar that tells you all about the customs associated with each day. The trouble comes when said calendar is so nice that you decide you don't want to write anything on it, so you live your life depending on your frail human memory to tell you when you've got to do something. My childhood home town has a community radio programme that broadcasts for a few days this week. I knew all about it, but still managed to completely forget to listen to my Mum's interview, and to the play about folk songs being collected in the local workhouse in 1908. I really really wanted to hear the play, since I did quite a bit of research about those workhouse singers a few years ago. Grr!!!!

3. Sainsbury's seems to be very proud of the fact that you can now pretty much do your entire week's food shop in the petrol station. It is not something to boast about! I was quarter of an hour waiting for petrol yesterday, and the queue for the petrol station was grinding traffic to a halt in the whole area. So many people were dilly-dallying around the shop, very slowly choosing food, while their car sat there empty, blocking a pump. Even people who only wanted to pay for petrol had to queue patiently behind all those people with their overflowing baskets. Grr!!!!

4. While on the subject of Sainsbury's, and not really a grr, I think I need to learn that just because you can pick up a free pasta bowl with the five stickered items you were going to buy anyway, you don't have to. I can foresee a future in which large white pasta bowls feature very highly, gradually taking over the kitchen, and soon, indeed, the world.

5. Having two late alcohol-fuelled nights in a row plays havoc with one's ability to write. It also makes you feel that playing Guitar Hero on "expert" is a good idea. It does, however, somewhat take away your ability to manage a single coherent note. This makes you frustrated. This makes you do silly things like... er... dropping a laptop on a glass of home-made plum wine...
ladyofastolat: (Boo)
2007-09-04 05:45 pm
Entry tags:

Frustration

Frustration is: Writing the dialogue of a four page scene fluently and word-perfect in your head in the shower... and then forgetting every last word of it as soon as you get out and are sitting at your computer again. Grr!
ladyofastolat: (Hear me roar)
2007-08-26 08:15 am
Entry tags:

Suicidal animals

What is it with me this weekend? Why does every bird and animal on Vectis feel the need to leap out in front of me? On a trip to West Wight yesterday, I almost squashed a pheasant, a partridge, a baby pigeon, two rabbits, a stoatorweasel, and a red squirrel. This is far too many to be mere coincidence. I think a description of my car has been given out on the Fur and Feather Radio Station. Clearly they know that I'm the sort of person who will do anything I can to avoid hitting said beasties, rather than being one of those drivers who goes, "Yay! Road kill!" and gleefully squashes them. Either I have been chosen for a giant introductory game of chicken ("Baby's First Insane Brush With Death. Ah, how cute! Let's put it in the family album"), or unhappy animals are using me for their suicide attempts/cries for help, knowing that I almost certainly won't really hit them.

The sound of crunching in the evening )
ladyofastolat: (Default)
2007-08-24 07:50 pm
Entry tags:

Boring couples

In an email today, [livejournal.com profile] evilmissbecky happened to mention Joss Whedon's oft-stated opinion that "happy couples are boring" - hence his decision to painfully tear any happy couple apart in all his shows. I know I've ranted about it before in an email, so rather than do so again, I'm doing it on LJ instead.

Happy couples are boring )