Date: 2008-01-24 08:42 am (UTC)
Hmm... I do think he might have a point there, actually. (Though of course I wasn't there so don't know exactly what he said or what reasons he gave.) I have sometimes got the impression that authors and publishers have looked at the long Harry Potter books, and decided that "children's fantasy books have to be huge." I've read quite a few that seem to me to be far longer than they need to be - i.e. that are (in my mind) long just for the sake of being long, and would actually be a lot more effective at half the length. I feel this in adult fantasy series fairly often, too - that publishers expect these things to come in trilogies or endless series, but that quite a lot of the tales these authors have to tell would be better told in a single book or a shorter series.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

ladyofastolat: (Default)
ladyofastolat

July 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 12:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios