ladyofastolat: (sneezing lion)
ladyofastolat ([personal profile] ladyofastolat) wrote2014-11-11 12:18 pm
Entry tags:

Things: a list

A Thing that has outraged me: Othello retold for young beginner readers, in a series aimed at children aged 6 to 8 or thereabouts. Othello? WHY? Cue my long and oft-repeated rant that delayed my book selection by a considerable time.

A Thing that has interested me: As soon as the 2 minute silence finished, and the sound of the maroon had faded away, I scurried to the dictionary to find the link between the colour and the distress signal. Apparently they come from the same word: the French for "chestnut." The colour is chestnut-coloured, while the firework pops like a chestnut roasting on an open fire. The verb "to maroon" comes from a different root, though: the Spanish for "wild." So now you know.

A Thing that has bemused me: I stumbled upon an old episode of Buffy on the SyFy channel mid-afternoon on Saturday. "The following programme contained paranormal practices," it said (or words to that effect), "and is intended for entertainment purposes only." I've never heard such a warning before, even in the days when Buffy was shown on BBC2 at tea-time, and then cut so badly that some episodes were incomprehensible. But what other purposes would anyone put Buffy to? A how-to manual?

Another Thing that has interested me: I'm reading a book on the history of the Tower of London menagerie at the moment, and it's full of interesting snippets. In the 12th century, Londoners were commanded to pay for a chain and muzzle so the King's polar bear could fish for its own dinner in the Thames. In the 15th century, the menagerie was opened to select public, who either had to pay an admission fee, or bring along a cat or a dog which could be fed to the lions. I wonder what delights later centuries will bring?
ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2014-11-11 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Othello for beginners ??? WHY? NO! STOP!

I share your outrage.

[identity profile] kargicq.livejournal.com 2014-11-11 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I'm loving the bizarreness of Othello for early readers. I trust they had Hamlet too? I may have to order them. - N

[identity profile] ladyofastolat.livejournal.com 2014-11-12 09:22 am (UTC)(link)
They did indeed have Hamlet. :-) When I looked it up, I saw that several other publishers also do Hamlet in their "short chapter books" series aimed at children aged around 6 or 7. Although nothing is quite as bizarre as Wuthering Heights for babies and toddlers (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Little-Miss-Bronte-Wuthering-Heights/dp/1423631730), and all the others in that series.

[identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com 2014-11-12 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
If you haven't seen the series of books for, I think, all of Shakespeare's plays, at least the well-known ones, that have the text on one page and a "translation" into modern, casual English on the facing page, avoid the mere sight of them.