ladyofastolat (
ladyofastolat) wrote2014-03-26 06:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Food labelling grr
(Dried) Egg pappardelle, "bySainsbury's" (ingredients: durum wheat semolina, free range egg (16%)): kcal per 100g: 372
(Dried) "Pappardelle made with free range eggs," Sainsbury's Taste the Difference (ingredients: durum wheat semolina, free range egg (24%)): kcal per 100g: 141
Something does not compute here! One would expect a slightly higher egg content to make some difference to the calorie content, but not this much.
But the plot thickens. Version 1 claims that a serving is 100g. Version 2 claims that a serving is 200g. Presumably, in version 1, 100g refers to dry weight, whereas in version 2, is refers to cooked weight, with the weight doubled by water. Nowhere is this made clear. And, in this case, version 2 is particularly unhelpful to me as I stand there with my weighing scales, measuring out a sensible portion size, since if I do it without measuring, it always balloons into enough to feed a hungry army. I don't often cook dried pasta, so can never remember what's a sensible portion size, so I could very easily have measured out 200g of dried pasta per person today, were it not for the fact that I still had a tiny bit left of the old packet left, and could compare.
I do appreciate nutritional information on food, but sometimes they seem to go out of their way to obscure what they really mean. Grump!
(Dried) "Pappardelle made with free range eggs," Sainsbury's Taste the Difference (ingredients: durum wheat semolina, free range egg (24%)): kcal per 100g: 141
Something does not compute here! One would expect a slightly higher egg content to make some difference to the calorie content, but not this much.
But the plot thickens. Version 1 claims that a serving is 100g. Version 2 claims that a serving is 200g. Presumably, in version 1, 100g refers to dry weight, whereas in version 2, is refers to cooked weight, with the weight doubled by water. Nowhere is this made clear. And, in this case, version 2 is particularly unhelpful to me as I stand there with my weighing scales, measuring out a sensible portion size, since if I do it without measuring, it always balloons into enough to feed a hungry army. I don't often cook dried pasta, so can never remember what's a sensible portion size, so I could very easily have measured out 200g of dried pasta per person today, were it not for the fact that I still had a tiny bit left of the old packet left, and could compare.
I do appreciate nutritional information on food, but sometimes they seem to go out of their way to obscure what they really mean. Grump!
no subject
Tip for pasta measuring: Hubby thinks that half an ordinary sized mug of dried pasta is about right for one person. You end up with enough pasta to cover a dinner plate with only a slight heaping in the middle. And for rice, he thinks that about a mug full of dried rice is enough for a person - though I find three-quarters is about right for me. Does this help any?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject