ext_27571 ([identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ladyofastolat 2008-01-22 09:58 pm (UTC)

I'm no scientist, but I can see what you're talking about as regards science coverage in newspapers. I suppose my areas of expertise would be politics, economics and accountancy, and I think newspaper coverage of these areas is rather better. Politics gets done to death of course. Economics coverage depends on which newspaper you read, but a lot are pretty good and entirely sensible and knowledgeable in their coverage. In a way, I'm not that surprised by this. I'm more surprised by the high quality of coverage of accountancy issues. For example, newspaper coverage of pension scheme deficits did a good job of explaining in layman's terms the effects of FRS 17. I think what must be happening is that journalists are talking to people in the City who know these things.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting